begin page 133 | back to top

Francis Curtis and Richard Dean. Blake: A Software Package. West Sussex Institute of Higher Education, Bishop Otter College, College Lane, Chichester, West Sussex, England, PO19 4PE, 1987.

The search for new ways of teaching is as essential as keeping up with the latest developments in literary theory; indeed, it might even be said that literary theory necessitates new ways of teaching. Blake: A Software Package is not the answer to all of our problems in presenting Blake to undergraduate students previously virtually unacquainted with his work, but it presents an interesting field for further exploration and I found the process of evaluation quite a revealing one.

My students do a fairly traditional English literature program which they take with one other subject such as sociology, history, classical studies, drama, or geography. Blake is a year-two author in a traditional “author”-based course where he is taught after Wordsworth but before “the others.” Seminar groups each comprise about eight to ten students who have been reading and discussing, at least, The Book of Thel, Songs of Innocence and of Experience, Visions of the Daughters of Albion, and America, while lectures will have introduced them to the wider work of Blake. Blake’s illuminated books are projected, as complete works, onto the seminar room wall and discussion takes place on that basis. It was within this framework of teaching that I introduced the software package at the end of the course of seminars. The Blake software is easy to load and runs on a BBC microcomputer with 32K of RAM. It is currently the system most widely found in the U.K. for use in schools and in further and higher education.

The title of the program, Blake: A Software Package, is rather misleading as it is based entirely on “London” and does not offer an introduction to the rest of the Songs let alone Blake’s other works. My first impression on using the program was how odd it seemed to go back to the printed word (even in electronic form) after looking quite intensively at the combination of Blake’s word and image. Perhaps one would need to look forward to a new age of electronics (and a new age of funding) for software which could incorporate high-quality visuals with some sort of enhancement to explore the detail of Blake’s between-the-line illuminations. Nevertheless, loading the floppy disc is easy and you soon have another “person” in the seminar room as the T.V. monitor’s ice-cold eye awaits appeasement and suggestion.

begin page 134 | back to top

The program’s introductory messages are laid out in colored blocks of text with simple instructions. Using the software via the keyboard is extremely easy, merely a question of typing in words or letters or using the space bar. It’s not much good as an introduction to the BBC hardware or to computing but, on the other hand, it quells computer fright. The first menu is the only part of the program that is truly interactive and this simply asks you to “fill in the missing word” so “charter’d” must be correctly contracted and punctuated even if one of the other missing words, “appalls,” swallows up the comma at the end of the line if you are to get the CORRECT message. This proved to be quite a good way of seeing how closely students had acclimatized themselves to Blake’s writing.

The second phase of the program leads to simple manuscript revisions of “London” which signal obvious points for general discussion: such as why Blake eventually decided “charter’d” rather than “dirty,” “mark” rather than “see,” “Infants cry of fear” rather than “voice of every child.” It’s at this level that one realizes that the software package is aimed at schools at least as much, if not more than, institutions of higher education. There is also no further scope for interactivity between student and program after this section. Indeed, the program implicitly reintroduces the tutor so that monitor and program virtually become a colored open text book.

The third phase presents a rather traditional list of “high” literary texts which might provide a literary context for Blake’s “London.” These include Johnson’s “London: A Poem,” Swift’s “A Description of the Morning,” and “A Description of a City Shower,” Gay’s “Trivia, or the Art of Walking the Streets of London,” essays such as Addison’s on “The Royal Exchange,” Steele’s “The Hours of London,” and passages from Defoe’s Moll Flanders and Wordsworth’s The Prelude. The student then looks these pieces up in the anthologies often available for undergraduate teaching.

The fourth part of the program calls up Wordsworth’s “Composed Upon Westminster Bridge” and The Prelude (1805) 7.593-598 for further discussion and comparison. The fifth and final part of the program isolates gnomic looking lines from Johnson’s “London”:

In vain, these Dangers past, your Doors you close,
And hope the balmy Blessings of Repose:
Cruel with Guilt, and daring with Despair,
The midnight Murd’rer bursts the faithless Bar;
Invades the sacred Hour of silent Rest
And leaves, unseen, a Dagger in your Breast. (236-241)
Studying the lines out of their Johnsonian context, on the screen, in the seminar room, it seemed to us that Blake’s “Harlots curse” of “plagues” might suggest a similar “venereal disease” reading of Johnson’s lines. This is the most sophisticated work we did on the program; the compilers have suitably tailored it so that the greatest degree of difficulty of response is reached at the end. The students did find it, at first, slightly unusual to have a T. V. monitor rather than just me on the end of the desk but within a few minutes they were able to accept it as being a neutral object in the room to which one referred as to the printed page. The most noticeable feature of using this software was exactly this, that it became a talking point around which the discussion could, but needn’t, circulate.

The major limitation of Blake: A Software Package is the tiny capacity of the floppy disc and the BBC computer: there’s very little one can do with such a small memory and it seems to rule out searching individual words across, say, the Songs, or calling up full, line by line revisions. Given that the lack of a good graphics facility is likely to continue, I still think there are things that unsophisticated computers, and even more unsophisticated computer operators, can do to give an extra dimension to teaching.

For example, it would be good to have a program capable of referring the reader to texts which might be associated with the Songs but which are not “high” literature, such as contemporary texts relevant to chimney sweeps, or hymns for children or contemporary newspaper items. All these are difficult to get out of books without having a toppling pile in the seminar room. Gathering together such disparate materials on disc would be a useful aid to teaching. On a more specialized note, it would be good to have in a computer program the various orderings of the Songs of Innocence and of Experience with some simple function so that the student could work out Blake’s statistical preferences. Again, I believe that this would be a more exciting use of information technology than merely using the program as a televised book.

Blake: A Software Package is neatly produced on screen, easy to read, easy to use (the accompanying handouts are rather dismal in their range of suggestions and presentation although the A5 format lends itself to photocopying as worksheets). It would be good to see Francis Curtis and Richard Dean have the opportunity to edit and publish more powerful programs in the field of Blake and Romantic studies.

Print Edition

  • Publisher
  • Department of English, University of Rochester
  • Rochester, NY, USA
    • Editors
    • Morris Eaves
    • Morton D. Paley
    • Bibliographer
    • Detlef W. Dörrbecker
    • Review Editor
    • Nelson Hilton
    • Associate Editor for Great Britain
    • David Worrall
    • Production Office
    • Morris Eaves
    • Morton D. Paley
    • Detlef W. Dörrbecker
    • Nelson Hilton
    • David Worrall
    • Managing Editor
    • Patricia Neill
    • Contributors
    • John E. Grant
    • Nelson Hilton
    • John A. Hodgson
    • Andrew Lincoln
    • David W. Lindsay
    • M. A. L. Locherbie-Cameron
    • Paul Mann
    • Peter Otto
    • Warren Stevenson
    • David Worrall

    Digital Edition

    • Editors:
    • Morris Eaves, University of Rochester
    • Robert Essick, University of California, Riverside
    • Joseph Viscomi, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    • Managing Editor
    • Joe Fletcher
    • Assistant Editor Editor
    • Michael Fox
    • Previous Project Manager and Technical Editor
    • William Shaw
    • Adam McCune
    • Managing Editor Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly
    • Sarah Jones
    • Project Director and Assistant Project Manager
    • Grant Glass
    • Project Coordinator, University of Rochester:
    • Eric Loy
    • Scanning:
    • UNC Digital Production Center
    • XML Encoding:
    • Apex CoVantage
    • Additional Transcription:
    • Adam McCune
    • Jennifer Park
    • Emendations:
    • Rachael Isom
    • Mary Learner
    • Adam McCune
    • Ashley Reed
    • Jennifer Park
    • Scott Robinson
    • XSLT Development:
    • Adam McCune
    • Joseph Ryan
    • William Shaw
    • PHP and Solr Development:
    • Michael Fox
    • Adam McCune
    • Project Assistants:
    • Lauren Cameron,
    • Rachael Isom,
    • Mary Learner,
    • Jennifer Park,
    • Ashley Reed,
    • Adair Rispoli,
    • Scott Robinson
    • Sponsors
    • Funders
    • Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly
    • William Blake Archive
    • Carolina Digital Library and Archives
    • Use Restrictions
    • Copyright © 2019 Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly, all rights reserved. Items in this digital edition may be shared in accordance with the Fair Use provisions of U.S. copyright law. Redistribution or republication on other terms, in any medium, requires express written consent from the editors and advance notification of the publisher. Permission to reproduce the graphic images in this digital edition rests with the owning institutions.