111 total results for “todd” (showing results 1-10)
Sort options
Advanced search options
Article
William Blake and His Circle: A Checklist of Publications and Discoveries in 2014
Volume 49 · Issue 1 (Summer 2015)
Review
Burning Bright: William Blake and the Art of the Book, John Rylands Library, University of Manchester, February–June 2013
Volume 48 · Issue 3 (Winter 2014-15)
That Fuseli gave Blake a free hand when he was working up the sketch is
probable, but this notion doesn’t reveal how close they were, how often they met, and indeed how Fuseli
treated his engravers (on their relationship, see Todd). The exhibition label, in short, made a bold and
unsubstantiated claim. (...) Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.
Todd, Ruthven. “Two Blake Prints and Two Fuseli Drawings.”
Article
“Ah! Romney!”: Blake’s “Supernaculum” Portrait Engraving of George Romney
Volume 47 · Issue 3 (Winter 2013-14)
See Gilchrist, Life of William Blake,
ed. Todd (London: J. M. Dent and Sons; New York: E. P. (...) In a typescript catalogue of Blake’s paintings and drawings, Todd also
claims that “a copy of this rejected plate” is “in the collection of Mr.
(...) For the suggestion that
Todd’s statements are based on the entry in the Philadelphia exhibition
catalogue, see Crosby and Essick 63 and n30.
Article
William Blake and His Circle: A Checklist of Publications and Discoveries in 2012
Volume 47 · Issue 1 (Summer 2013)
Article
William Blake and His Circle: A Checklist of Publications and Discoveries in 2011
Volume 46 · Issue 1 (Summer 2012)
Article
Attribution and Reproduction: Death Pursuing the Soul through the Avenues of Life
Volume 45 · Issue 2 (Fall 2011)
Mabel Zahn, Sessler’s employee of many years who oversaw prints and
drawings, told me that she had been corresponding with Ruthven Todd
about the work, and that Todd had in turn told Butlin about it. (...) Todd’s letter begins with the forceful statement that “I find
that Martin Butlin agrees with me that Mrs. (...) Zahn included a photocopy of Todd’s letter with her letter to me of 19 Aug. 1971.
3.